|
My book, Cosmic Trends,
has just been published.
Order
Your Copy Now!

|
|
Astrology
of the U.S. and Iraq
Clouds
of War:
Neptune, the
U.S. and Iraq
by
Philip Brown
(Published
in The
Mountain Astrologer, Dec. 2003/Jan. 2004)
“The French rushed into the courtyard,
headed by their captain.
It was his first success of the war.
His face beamed with triumph.
He waved his sword, shouting, ‘Victory! Victory!’”
—from the ironic ending to "The
Miller's Daughter," by Emile Zola, a short story wherein
two clashing armies, the French and the Prussians,
wage a back and forth battle for an idyllic river
mill, in the process destroying it and its loving,
mutually self-sacrificing family.
One way of looking at
the recent events in Iraq is through composite horoscopes.
Although traditionally used as tools to examine
human relationships, composite charts can also provide
unique insights into international relations.[i]
Astrologer
Michael Baigent advocates the Middle East Mandate
of the League of Nations as a “master chart”
and central reference point when examining events
centering in that region.[ii]
The Middle East Mandate imposed political divisions
after World War I, creating the artificial states
of Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and Lebanon. In
particular, the carving out by Western nations of
arbitrary borders, rather than indigenous ones, foreshadowed
current Western desires to shape the development of
post-Saddam Hussein Iraq as well as the wider Middle
East. In
addition, the Middle East Mandate failed to provide
a homeland for the Kurds, presently confined to northern
Iraq, a situation which has not changed with any subsequent
Iraqi government.
Middle East
Mandate
Rather
than just use a
founding chart for Iraq, I have instead used
composite charts.
A composite chart for the Middle East Mandate
and Iraq sets the current Iraqi conflict into a regional
framework. There
are a number of other ways of combining Middle East
political and event charts.
The Middle East Mandate chart may be viewed
in composite with just about any other national horoscope
whose interests coincide with the Middle East. Transits
to these composite charts are very revealing, as are
composite planetary return charts. The
chart for the Middle East Mandate can be viewed very
tellingly on its own, and points of synastry between
the Middle East Mandate and U.S. horoscopes also show
some remarkable contacts.
The
Middle East chart has Cancer rising and a first
house conjunction of the Moon, Jupiter, and Neptune
all in Leo—a strong belief system indeed!
It is worth noting that the Middle East Mandate
(Article 22 of the League of Nations covenant) can
be interpreted in two possible ways: 1) a benign
attempt by the principal allied powers (which did
not officially include the United States because
then-President Wilson was unable to get Congress
to ratify the League of Nations treaty) to protect
the rights of Middle Eastern people defeated in
World War I; or 2) a sinister attempt by Western
powers to control Middle East development and assets
(i.e., oil).
One possible interpretation of the Middle
East 12th house Pluto, therefore, is
“behind the scenes control” or “the
power behind the throne” (Great Britain, which
was given the Iraqi mandate, quickly began to lose
control over the country in a manner strikingly
similar to the present occupation; the British wasted
little time before installing a monarchy in Iraq
in 1921). In the horoscope for the Middle East,
Pluto closely sextiles another planet with control
issues, Saturn, and at the approximate midpoint
of these two planets is the Moon-Jupiter-Neptune
conjunction.
The Taurus MC exactly squares the Jupiter-Neptune
degree of the conjunction, an astrological recipe
for religious beliefs on a collision course with
land and a constant internal tension borne of fiery
beliefs (Jupiter in Leo) eroding (Neptune) the ruling
power structures (Taurus MC).
This symbolism is repeated in the exact opposition
of Saturn and Uranus in the Middle East chart.
Not surprisingly, these planetary themes
are played out repeatedly in various composites,
transits for major events, and planetary return
charts.
The
horoscope for the Middle East Mandate shows that
what affects one nation also affects others in the
region. For example, Iraq has currently become a
magnet for anti-U.S. sentiment across the region,
resulting in the destabilizing presence of non-Iraqi
insurgents from other Middle East countries. In
the 1991 Gulf War, Iraq tried to draw Israel into
the conflict by firing Scud missiles into Tel Aviv.
In addition, there is frequently a disconcerting
symmetry of events. On August 19, 2003, at 4:45
p.m. local time, a massive explosion tore apart
the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad. A
horoscope for this bombing shows the event Ascendant
exactly on the Middle East Descendant; the Scorpio
MC for the U.N. bombing squares the key Jupiter-Neptune
conjunction of the Middle East chart. A little more
than four hours after the U.N. headquarters was
bombed, there was a massive bus explosion in Jerusalem. A chart for that event
shows the Ascendant degree conjuncting the Middle
East Mercury. In addition, the MC for the bus explosion
opposes the Middle East Pluto while the Middle East
Saturn-Uranus opposition forms an exact trine (for
Saturn) and sextile (for Uranus) to the bus explosion
MC . This
astrological synchronicity—two horrific bombings
four hours apart in two Middle Eastern nations--
highlights the intertwined destinies in this part
of the world.
The
horoscope for the Middle East Mandate shows surprising
synastry with the U.S. Sibly chart. The U.S. Jupiter
exactly conjoins the Middle East Pluto.
The Middle East Jupiter-Neptune conjunction
is within one degree of the U.S. horoscope’s
North Lunar Node, clearly linking the U.S. national
destiny with the whole of the Middle East.
Not coincidentally, the Middle East Mandate’s
Jupiter also conjuncts, within one degree, President
Bush’s Ascendant.
Constructing
a composite chart for Iraq and the Middle East Mandate
produces a T-square of rising Pluto (exactly on
the Ascendant, uniquely symbolizing the Middle East
power structure) opposing Mars, both squared by
a 4th house Saturn. The powerfully aggressive
and martial energy of this t-square is “deployed”
into the 10th house of national prestige.
The intensity of this planetary configuration
is heightened when one looks at the U.S. Sibly chart
and notes that the U.S. Pluto exactly conjoins the
Iraq/Middle East Mars. In
attempting to overpower (U.S. Pluto) the Iraqi military
dictatorship of Saddam Hussein (Iraq/Middle East
Mars in Capricorn), the U.S. has triggered the rest
of the explosive composite T-square. At the outset of
the previous Gulf War in 1991, the Iraq/Middle East
composite Mars took a direct hit from transiting
Saturn. Furthermore,
both the U.S. Sibly Neptune and Iraq/Middle East
Neptune are within two degrees of each other in
Virgo—both countries view each other through
distorted lenses; both chart’s Neptunes are
about to be squared throughout 2004 by transiting
Pluto, which may dramatically and inexorably intensify
the distorted perceptions of both nations.
Later in this article, we will examine some
of these points as future event triggers.

U.S.
and Iraq composite horoscope
A
composite chart for the United States and Iraq has
Neptune within one degree of the composite Ascendant. Throughout the current
conflict, transiting Neptune has trined the U.S./Iraq
Neptune, making the conflict for each side appear
deceptively easy.
A recent investigative article in the Los
Angeles Times revealed, through numerous
interviews with Iraqi military commanders, that
Saddam Hussein and his son Qusai truly believed
that the United States could be defeated in urban
fighting in Baghdad; the American public, they felt,
would quickly sour on the war once U.S. casualties
began to mount.[iii]
And President Bush famously proclaimed on
May 1, 2003, “In
the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies
have prevailed.”[iv]
Subsequent events have shown such words, proclaiming
a quick and easy victory, to have been perhaps a
bit premature.
It
should come as no surprise to find that, when examining
a relationship of (depending on one’s perspective)
liberation or invasion, the first casualty of such
a conflict is usually the truth. In any situation where
one finds a conflict between truth and appearance,
Neptune would be expected to play a prominent role.
Indeed, after first noting the strikingly
subjective and self-contained southern hemisphere
bowl pattern in a composite chart for the United
States and the Middle East Mandate (relocated to
Baghdad), Neptune can be seen as surprisingly active.
Neptune and Mercury are engaged in a dance of deception
in the composite chart and significant transits
to the composite.
Mercury (mass media, communication, and according
to Charles Carter, “changes”[v])
closely squares Neptune (oil, chemical weapons,
treachery, and confusion). This
would account for much of the distorted and inaccurate
earlier media coverage regarding the search for
chemical weapons.
For example, the confluence of mass media,
chemical weapons, and confusion (or Neptunian deception,
depending on one’s perspective) was clearly
in evidence on April 4, 2003, as MSNBC first reported
the discovery of “evidence of ricin [and]
botulinum” at an “Islamic militants’
camp” in Sargat, outside Baghdad.[vi]
Later tests showed there were no such forbidden
weapons of mass destruction at that site.
Neptune conjuncts Mars, the ruling planet
of the military, in the U.S./Middle East chart.
This configuration seems to perfectly symbolize
the situation in which the occupying military forces
currently find themselves: total military victory,
symbolized by a Leonine Mars, is dissipated in wisps
of Neptunian smoke and that which appeared to be—an
easily victorious war—has become in truth
a difficult occupation.
The U.S. leadership chose not to reconstitute
the Iraqi army because they felt it could not be
trusted, leading to the present situation of a rapidly
invading army (Mars) seeming to lose all momentum
(Neptune), like a speeding army tank which runs
out of gas and slowly comes to a sputtering stop.
The
U.S./Middle East composite Mars squares the chart
ruler Venus, “a planet of victory,”[vii]
further illustrating the difficulty the United States
has experienced in winning this war. Venus is conjunct
the fixed star Algol.
According to Bernadette Brady, “The
Chinese called [Algol] Tsieh She, meaning Piled
Up Corpses...Algol represents a strong consuming
passion that may devour…with anger and rage.”[viii]
The chart-ruling Venus, planet of “victory,”
may end up being bought at a very high human cost.
Transiting Uranus squared this point (25
degrees of Taurus) in early October, just as Congress
was passing a resolution authorizing President Bush
to use all force necessary to insure national security
and enforce Iraqi compliance with U.N. resolutions.
A
composite chart must address not only the present,
but also the past and the future in a relationship. The Mars-Neptune conjunction
appears to have played out in the first Iraq war
of 1991, when allied forces withdrew from the battle
front after routing the Iraqi military from Kuwait,
but leaving Saddam Hussein alive and still in power.
Many have since questioned the lack of finality
in that war: military resolve (Mars) became subsumed
by a need to adhere to the limitations of United
Nations resolution 678, which called for the use
of force only to expel Iraq from Kuwait (I believe
the U.N., a 12th house organization that
exists in its current state to help others, is ruled
by Neptune).
A quick military Martian thrust (Operation
Desert Storm) was dissipated in a Neptunian sandstorm
of global politics.
The MC of the Desert Storm chart is conjunct
the U.S./Middle East composite Neptune, indicating
the strong U.N. role, as well as a lack of clarity
in the outcome.
In addition, Neptune at the time of Operation
Desert Storm squared both the U.S./Iraq Ascendant
and U.S./Iraq Neptune.
Neptune
in both the U.S./Iraq composite and the U.S./Middle
East composite rules the 6th house, identified
with the armed forces and public health in mundane
astrology.
Neptune relates to chemicals and hospitals.
The hard-to-diagnose Neptunian illness known
as Gulf War Syndrome has plagued military personnel
since the cessation of Operation Desert Storm.
Iraq’s
infrastructure, which includes power planets (Uranus),
electricity grids (Uranus), water (Neptune) and
waste (Pluto) systems, has been severely damaged
through looting and sabotage.
Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), in acknowledging
that the U.S. postwar policy has been flawed, recently
said that “…we did underestimate the
deterioration of the infrastructure” in Iraq.[ix]
Transiting Saturn (which might be said to
rule the “skeleton” of a nation) conjuncted
the U.S./Iraq composite Uranus in mid-2003 and
began to square the U.S./Iraq Neptune, while transiting
Neptune began to square Pluto in the same composite.
These transits signal that significant problems
with the Iraqi infrastructure will continue well
into 2004.
If
we look back at previous international conflicts,
we also find that Neptune has a large role to play. Neptune figured prominently
in another war: the Gulf of Tonkin resolution is
now recognized by historians as a deception by Lyndon
Johnson to get Congress to enact the closest thing
we ever had to a Vietnam war resolution. On
the day that the Gulf
of Tonkin resolution was approved by Congress
(August 7, 1964), a conjunction of the Sun (the
president) and the Moon (the people) exactly squared
Neptune. Perhaps
the strength of Neptune at these times has to do
with the fact that in most armed conflicts, there
are always degrees of deceit, hidden elements, and
appearances are at variance with the truth.
The
President’s State of the Union speech is delivered
to Congress in January.
The 2003 State of the Union address (delivered
during a Sun-Neptune conjunction) has proved problematic
for the President, freighted as it was with those
infamous 16 words stating that Iraq had sought to
purchase uranium ore.
The January 2004 State of the Union address,
scheduled for January 29 at 9:00 p.m. in Washington
DC, replays the Sun-Neptune conjunction and Neptune
squares the Moon (albeit by a 6 degree separating
aspect).
On
November 8, 2004, Saturn will go stationary retrograde
at 27 degrees of Cancer, where it will oppose exactly
the Iraq/Middle East Saturn and square exactly the
intense Iraq/Middle East Mars (as well as the U.S.
Sibly Pluto). November 8, 2004, also happens
to be six days after a presidential election, indicating
the strong possibility of a dramatic convergence
of the election and events in
Iraq.
We
have seen the less savory side of Jupiter during
the ongoing Pluto transit through Jupiter-ruled
Sagittarius, a time fraught with all manner of beliefs
and true believers squaring off in sometimes violent
confrontation.
Jupiter returned to its Middle East Mandate
“natal” degree—conjuncting Neptune,
squaring the MC of the Middle East chart--on September
12. 2002, the day that President Bush addressed
the United Nations to proclaim that the U.S. would
proceed unilaterally against Iraq if the U.N. did
not offer support for possible military action. Jupiter again hit this
degree on March 13 and April 26, 2003, roughly encompassing
the duration of the U.S.-led military invasion of
Iraq. Going
back 12 years—the length of a cycle of Jupiter--would
bring us to 1991 and, in fact, Jupiter returned
to its natal degree in late 1990 and early 1991. One
of the dates of Jupiter’s return was January
27, 1991, eleven days after the official start of
“Operation Desert Storm.”
Going back 12 more years would bring us to
1979. A
Jupiter return occurred on June 21, 1979, approximately
three weeks before Iraqi President Al-Bakr resigned
and was succeeded by his then-vice president, Saddam
Hussein.
A
Jupiter return chart for the first Jupiter return
contact in the present cycle (September 12, 2002)
gives an Ascendant of 0 degrees of Pisces, which
Uranus hit exactly as the current military conflict
proceeded. The U.S./Middle East Neptune is right
on the Descendant of this Jupiter return chart.
In the return chart, Neptune exactly opposes
Jupiter and both planets may be said to rule the
Pisces Ascendant.
Since this chart symbolizes events for the
next twelve years, we will likely see a continuation
and expansion of Middle East regional Piscean and
Neptunian themes which have been suggested in this
article. At
the time of the next Jupiter return in 2014, with
Pluto in Capricorn squaring the U.S./Iraq Ascendant
and Neptune, we may witness another major regional
turning point, the exact nature of which is hidden
but will in all likelihood involve the same unresolved
themes as the current conflict.
The current conflict/occupation/pacification
is not the end, but part of a still-unfolding process
Experience more
unique astrology insights.
SUBSCRIBE
to my FREE monthly astrology trends e-newsletter.
Read a recent sample.
References and Notes
[i]
John Townley, in Composite Charts: The Astrology
of Relationships (St. Paul, Minnesota: Llewellyn
Publications, 2000), includes a section on the
efficacy of mundane and “semi-mundane”
composites, in which he includes a composite
chart for Iraq and the United States.
[ii]
Michael Baigent, Nicholas Campion, and Charles
Harvey. Mundane Astrology,
London: Thorsons, 1995, p. 473.
Michael Baigent’s discussion of
the historical background and importance of
this chart are on pages 471-476, with a chart
for the Middle East Mandate shown on page 472.
[iii]
David Zucchino, “Iraq’s Swift Defeat
Blamed on Leaders,” Los Angeles Times,
August 11, 2003, p. A1.
[iv]
“Bush Speech: Full Text,” BBC News,
May 2, 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2994345.stm
[v]
Charles Carter.
An Introduction to Political Astrology,
Southampton, England: L.N. Fowler & Co.
Ltd, 1951, p. 88. This book was Carter’s
attempt to address what he saw as the general
inability of astrology and astrologers to have
forecast World War II.
He looks back at how this might have
been done and, near the end of his book, lays
out key words and concepts for the planets and
the houses in political (a synonym for mundane)
astrology.
I have relied greatly on his simple and
straightforward meanings for mundane planets
and houses.
[vii]
Charles Carter, An Introduction to Political
Astrology, p. 88.
[viii]
Bernadette Brady,
Brady’s Book of Fixed Stars,
York Beach, Maine: Samuel Weiser, Inc., 1998,
pp. 188-189.
[ix]
Janet Hook, “Lawmakers Seek Bush’s
Iraq Strategy,” Los Angeles Times,
Sept. 3, 2003, p. A1
|
|